The Cavaliers front office isn't afraid
to make bold moves, and this is a good thing. In an NBA where there
is too much group-think, the Cavs choose to make every move on how
they evaluate players, not on how other teams do.
However, when a team goes out on a limb
in three straight drafts, that team leaves itself open for criticism
if the moves don't work out. And in the Cavaliers case, this is
especially true. It is not that the team now has no options; there
will be cap room going forward and the Cavaliers have a star in Kyrie
Irving. Nonetheless, it's hard not to imagine how exciting the team
would be in Cleveland if the Cavaliers handled a few things
differently.
To be fair, the Cavaliers got the most
important decision right: taking Kyrie Irving over Derrick Williams.
It is easy to forget, but, with Irving coming off an injury-plagued
season at Duke, some thought Williams was the better pick. Irving
looks like he'll be a superstar for years, and Williams has been
mostly a bust. So give the front office in Cleveland credit for this.
However, imagine if the Cavaliers made
the following moves, all plausible ideas at the time (and not just
revisionist history...
Take Jonas Valanciunas instead of
Tristan Thompson It is hard to
fault the Cavaliers too much for reaching on Thompson. He has turned
into a valuable role player, as a high-motor player with a good feel
for the game. However, Cleveland passed on Valanciunas, who is a
legit 7-footer with ball skills and court vision. When Andrew Bynum
isn't playing, the Cavaliers are an undersized team up front. Having
Valanciunas would certainly solve that problem, and would remove a
player from the logjam Cleveland has at power forward
Take Harrison Barnes instead of Dion
Waiters This may be the hardest
call on the list. Cleveland certainly reached on Waiters, but the
consensus pick at the time would have been Thomas Robinson, who has
not worked out so far either. Without Thompson on the team, it's
certainly a possibility Cleveland would take Robinson with the fourth
pick. However, the thinking here is that the Cavaliers saw that a
team with Irving (who is still an awful defender) would need a good
defender on the perimeter. That, plus better shooting than Waiters
offers, would have been enough for the Cavs to reach slightly on
Barnes, who has turned into a fine player for the Warriors with
tremendous upside.
Take Victor Oladipo instead of
Anthony Bennett It's still too
early to call Bennett a bust, but he has been awful so far and
doesn't look ready to contribute this year. The Cavaliers have sworn
that they will make the playoffs this year, and the NBA-ready Oladipo
would have combined with Barnes to form an excellent perimeter
defending pair. He also moves well without the ball for a rookie, and
the Cavaliers desperately need more movement from their guards when
Kyrie has the ball.
Keep Shaun Livingston and don't sign
Jarrett Jack Jack is a nice
player, but he doesn't exactly fit on a team with a ball-dominator
like Irving. Livingston has been a great player for the Nets so far,
and is a much cheaper option.
Instead of signing Andrew Bynum,
overpay slightly for Paul Millsap The
Bynum signing was a good gamble by the Cavaliers, but Millsap might
have been the steal of the offseason. With Valanciunas in the fold
and no logjam at power forward anymore, the Cavaliers could have
offered Millsap a lot more money than the Hawks gave him in exchange
for a team option in year two. A two-year, $25 million deal with a
team option in year two maintains flexibility and gives the Cavaliers
a scorer currently averaging 15.8 PPG on 53% shooting.
Use the savings on the Jarrett Jack
contract to sign a shooter The
Cavaliers would still have plenty of cap room due to the discount
Livingston provides. A shooter off the bench would make this team
even better. Coincidentally, the Jack contract was very similar to
the contract given to Kyle Korver. Maybe Korver would leave Atlanta
to play with this exciting team for the same amount of money. If that
didn't work, one of the other cheaper shooters on the market would
have helped.
So
let's compare the two Cavaliers teams...
Current
team
PG
Kyrie Irving
SG
C.J. Miles
SF
Earl Clark
PF
Tristan Thompson
C
Andrew Bynum
Bench
Jarrett Jack
Bench
Dion Waiters
Bench
Alonzo Gee
Bench
Anderson Varejao
Bench
Anthony Bennett
Hypothetical team
PG Kyrie Irving
SG Victor Oladipo
SF Harrison Barnes
PF Paul Millsap
C Jonas Valanciunas
Bench Shaun Livingston
Bench C.J. Miles
Bench Alonzo Gee
Bench Anderson Varejao
Bench Kyle Korver
The
hypothetical team certainly needs another big, and would have to find
a veteran willing to play for the minimum or play Tyler Zeller a
decent amount of minutes. But the starters fit much better together,
with an excellent blend of offense and defense. Nobody needs the ball
in their hands other than Irving, but the other players are all
capable scorers. Also, four of the starters are young players who
should only improve. There is also the potential for a deadly
offensive small-ball lineup when Millsap rests, with Barnes at the
four and Korver at the three.
The
Cavaliers are fine going forward, and will have plenty of cap room to
try and improve. However, it is difficult to not imagine how easily
this could have been the most exciting up and coming team in the
league.
No comments:
Post a Comment